Is This a Murder House? What Oregon Sellers Have to Tell You, and What They Don't
You are standing in the primary bedroom at a Sunday open house. The light is great. The closet is bigger than you expected. And then a thought shows up that you did not invite: why is nobody living here?
The furniture is gone. Or worse, all of it is still here, arranged a little too carefully. You lean over to your agent and ask, as quietly as you can, the question everybody eventually asks.
"Did someone die here?"
I get some version of that question every October (and, to be fair, the other eleven months too). It deserves a real answer instead of a nervous laugh. So let's walk through what Oregon law requires a seller to tell you, what it does not, and why the gap between the two is where most of the confusion lives.
One note before we start. I am a real estate broker, not a lawyer. Everything below links to the actual statute so you can read it yourself, and if you are dealing with a specific situation, a real estate attorney is the right person to call.
First, the time a court ruled a house was haunted
This is a real case, and law students still read it.
A buyer named Jeffrey Stambovsky agreed to pay $650,000 for an 18-room Victorian in Nyack, New York, and put $32,500 down. Then he found out the house was locally famous for being haunted.
It turned out the seller, Helen Ackley, had been telling people about her ghosts for years. She wrote about them for Reader's Digest in 1977 and for the local paper in 1982, and the house had been featured on a walking tour as "a riverfront Victorian (with ghost)."
In 1991, the appeals court let the buyer try to undo the deal, and it included one of the best sentences ever written by a judge: as a matter of law, the house is haunted. The reasoning was that the seller had created the reputation herself, so she could not stay quiet about it to a buyer who had no way of knowing.
That is New York, though. Oregon went a different direction, and wrote it into law.
Why does everyone picture a crime scene?
When people say "murder house," they picture yellow tape. In the real world, the story is almost always much quieter.
It is usually someone who lived in that house for a long time, was loved, and died there at the end of a long life. Often with hospice. Often on purpose, because home is where they wanted to be.
That is more common than most people realize. By 2017, home had passed the hospital as the most common place Americans die, according to a study in the New England Journal of Medicine.
So when you ask "did someone die here?" about a house that has had owners for sixty or eighty years, the fair answer is: quite possibly. And almost always, that is not a scary story. It is just a life.
What does an Oregon seller not have to tell you?
Oregon has a statute for exactly this, ORS 93.275. It says the following are not material facts in a real estate transaction:
A death on the property or a neighboring property, whether by violent crime, suicide, or any other way.
A crime or other event that does not affect the physical condition of the property or its title.
That a prior owner or occupant had a bloodborne infection, such as HIV.
That a registered sex offender lives in the area.
An official notice that a neighboring property was used as a drug manufacturing site.
That word, material, is doing all the work. A material fact is one a seller and their agent have to deal with. A non-material fact is one nobody is required to bring up.
So where does Oregon draw the line?
At the house itself, and at who owns it. If something affects the physical condition of the property or the title, it matters. If it does not, the law treats it as history.
The cleanest way to see this is side by side.
A violent crime that happened in the house is not material. But if the house was used to cook meth, that is a very different story, because the residue is a physical condition. Oregon's disclosure form asks about it directly: "Has the Property ever been used as an illegal drug manufacturing or distribution site?"
Oregon REALTORS put the same logic about as neatly as it can be put: "Death is immaterial, but the physical location of the burial is quite material."
Same test every time. If it left something behind in the house, or on the title, it counts.
(For what it's worth, the things that actually cost buyers money tend to live underground, not in the attic. If you have never had a sewer line scoped, Should You Get a Sewer Scope? is the most useful ghost story on my site.)
What does a seller have to tell you?
Most Oregon sellers owe you a Seller's Property Disclosure Statement, the form laid out in ORS 105.464. It walks through the house system by system: title, water, sewer, roof, plumbing, electrical, and more. The seller answers yes, no, or unknown, based on what they actually know.
It does not ask whether anyone died in the house.
Here is the part that surprises most buyers. Once you receive that disclosure statement, you have five business days to revoke your offer, in writing, and get your deposit back. That comes from ORS 105.475. It is one of the most useful buyer protections in Oregon, and it is printed in capital letters at the top of the form for a reason.
If the house was built before 1978, there is also a federal layer. The seller has to disclose any known lead-based paint hazards, give you the EPA's lead pamphlet, and generally give you a chance to have the house tested. The EPA's real estate disclosure page has the details.
What about estates and trusts?
This is where buyers get suspicious, usually for no good reason.
Some sellers are exempt from the disclosure form entirely. Under ORS 105.470, that includes receivers, personal representatives, trustees, conservators and guardians, if appointed by a court. The classic example is a personal representative handling an estate through probate. That person may never have lived in the house and may not know whether the roof was replaced in 2009 or 1989.
So instead of a disclosure statement, the buyer gets a form saying the seller is exempt. And a lot of buyers read that as "they are hiding something." Most of the time it means the person selling the house has no way of answering the questions.
Two things are worth knowing here.
The exemption is narrower than people think. Those three words, "appointed by a court," matter. A trustee of a family or living trust usually gets their authority from the trust document, not from a judge, so the Oregon Real Estate Forms guidance is that those trustees still complete the disclosure statement, answering "unknown" where that is the truth.
Exempt from the form is not exempt from honesty. ORS 105.490 says the disclosure law does not limit claims for fraud or negligence. And under ORS 696.805, the seller's agent still has to disclose material facts they know about that are not apparent to the buyer. The form can be missing. The duty is not.
Can a seller just make something up, then?
No. Not having to bring something up and being allowed to invent an answer are two very different things. If a seller or an agent gives a false answer to a direct question, that is a different legal situation entirely, and one for an attorney.
Here is the part most buyers never see from the other side of the table.
A seller's agent owes their client confidentiality under ORS 696.805. And Oregon REALTORS' guidance to brokers is that they should not disclose non-material facts like these without first discussing it with their client and getting permission.
So when you ask the listing agent whether someone died in the house and they say, "Let me check with my seller," that is usually not a dodge. They may not be free to answer until their client says yes. It sounds evasive. It is often just an agent doing their job correctly.
What I usually tell my sellers
This part is my opinion, not the law.
When I am on the listing side, I bring this up before the house goes on the market, not after somebody asks. We decide ahead of time how you want to handle the question, so nobody is making it up on the spot during a showing.
And if a buyer asks directly, my recommendation is usually to let me give a simple, true answer, with your permission. Not because Oregon requires it. Because a buyer who hears it later from a neighbor, halfway through the inspection period, does not feel informed. They feel lied to. That is how perfectly good deals come apart in the repair negotiation, or turn into a headache after closing.
The good news is that the true answer is usually a gentle one. "The owner lived here for a long time and passed away at home" lands very differently when it is said plainly than when it comes after a long pause and a "let me get back to you."
If you are buying and this matters to you
People care about this for all kinds of reasons. Some for cultural or religious reasons, some because they are thinking about resale, and some just because it would bother them every time they walked down the hall. Every one of those is a valid reason, and you do not owe anyone an explanation.
If it matters to you, a few things help.
Ask in writing, before you write an offer. Have your agent send the question to the listing agent so there is a clear record of what was asked and what was answered.
Decide in advance what a non-answer means to you. In Oregon, a seller can decline to answer. If "I would rather not say" is a dealbreaker for you, it is much easier to know that before you are emotionally attached to the kitchen.
Do a little homework. Search the address in local news archives and obituaries. There are also paid services that claim to tell you whether someone died at an address. They exist. I cannot vouch for how accurate they are.
Talk to the neighbors. They usually know. They also occasionally embellish, so take the ghost stories with a grain of salt.
If you are selling
Decide how you want to handle the question before your house goes live, and tell your agent. If you are selling as a trustee or a personal representative, ask early which disclosure form applies to you, because the answer is not always the one people assume.
And if you are handling a parent's house right now, Your Parents' House Has Forty Years in It is where I would start. It covers the long list of things that come before this question.
Your situation is specific
Every one of these situations has its own details, and a blog post cannot know yours. Use this to understand the landscape, then get advice on your actual house from your agent, and from a real estate attorney if there is any real question about what has to be disclosed.
If you are sitting on one of these awkward questions, on either side of a sale, send it my way. It does not need to be about a house you are buying or selling this year. I would much rather you ask me the strange question now than lie awake Googling it at midnight.
One question for you: what is the strangest thing you have ever found out about a house after you moved in? I have a feeling the replies to this one are going to be good.
Warmly,
Tiffanie
Tiffanie Danley
Licensed Realtor in Oregon | Real Broker
Oregon License 201206631
P: 503-453-6580
IG: @tiffaniedanley
Comments